John P. Holton, Jr. v. Indiana Horse Racing Commission and Joe Gorajec

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the plaintiff “would encounter a problem [under sovereign immunity] had he asked the court to direct the Commission to reverse the stewards’ decision and pay him $6,250 . . . but a request for review differs from a request for damages.” (emphasis in original)
• “It is both unnecessary and inappropriate to decide whether the Constitution would prevent litigation that Congress has not authorized in the first place.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).