John P. Bosley v. Merit Systems Protection Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a party in a Board proceeding “must raise an issue before the administrative judge if the issue is to be preserved for review” before the Federal Circuit
• finding that a party in a Board proceeding “must raise an issue before the administrative judge if the issue is to be preserved for review” before the Federal Circuit
• explaining that “[a] party in [a board] proceeding must raise an issue before the administrative judge if the issue is to be preserved for re- view in this court”
• explaining that “[a] party in [a board] proceeding must raise an issue before the administrative judge if the issue is to be preserved for re- view in this court”
• addressing the prior Whis- tleblower Protection Act of 1989 and holding that the con- tinued monetary effects of a denial of a pay increase in 1988 were not separate continuing violations beyond the 1988 discrete act
• “A party in an MSPB proceeding must raise an issue before the administrative judge if the issue is to be preserved for review in this court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).