Skip to main content
· 11/25/2003

John O'Shea v. Anthony J. Welch, and American Drug Stores, Inc., Doing Business as Osco Drug, Farmers Insurance Company, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor

Citations

  • 350 F.3d 1101
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 24022
  • 2003 WL 22792350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “slight deviation” for “personal business” is still within the scope of employment if it “is sufficiently related to the employment”
  • listing factors to consider in deciding whether a deviation is slight or substantial
  • “Whether an employee is acting within the scope of his [or her] employment is generally a jury question.”
  • “We also agree that the public policies behind worker’s compensation and third party liability cases are different.”
  • \[w]e also agree that the public policies behind [workers'] compensation and third party liability cases are different\
  • “A slight deviation might be considered reasonably incidental to employment while a substantial deviation would not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Holloway, McKAY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.