John Ochana v. Fernando Flores and Anthony Schwocher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Ochana had no reason to believe that he was under custodial arrest for any offense. He was not told that he was under arrest -”
• “The court finds that any reference to recent publicized events concerning allegations of police misconduct would be unduly prejudicial, as it would distract the jury's attention from the conduct at issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).