Skip to main content
· 3/31/2015

John Michael Brack

Syllabus

1(b), Rules 2.193, 2.20, & 2.33 (signature & verification requirements); 2(d)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prosecutor’s brief misstatement of the law during closing rebuttal argument was curable had an objection been raised
  • holding that prosecutor’s brief misstatement of the law during closing rebuttal argument was curable had an objection been raised
  • where prosecutor’s rebuttal argument was improper because it misstated the law as to how the jury could view hearsay evidence, the defendant did not establish plain error because the argument was brief and curable if the defendant had objected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cataldo, Ritchie, Hightower

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.