Skip to main content
· 4/6/2015

John Matamoros v. William Stephens, Director

Citations

  • 783 F.3d 212
  • 2015 WL 1529093

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the presumption of correctness afforded a state habeas court’s factual findings applies absent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary
  • recognizing the presumption of correctness afforded a state habeas court’s factual findings applies absent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary
  • recognizing the presumption of correctness afforded a state habeas court’s factual findings applies absent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary
  • recognizing the presumption of correctness afforded a state habeas court’s factual findings applies absent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary
  • recognizing the presumption of correctness afforded a state habeas court’s factual findings applies absent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary
  • recognizing the presumption of correctness afforded a state habeas court’s factual findings applies absent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Elrod, Jolly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.