John M. Vanfossen v. Department of Housing and Urban Development

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Board’s failure to consider a significant mitigating circumstance constituted an abuse of discretion, and remanding for the Board to determine an appropriate lesser penalty
• “[F]ailure to consider a significant mitigating circumstance constitutes an abuse of discre- tion.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).