John M. Gould & Co. v. Louisiana Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, where generic drugs “purportedly generate[d] a substantial amount of revenue for pharmaceutical company, court could impute knowledge about generic drug pricing to company’s high-level officers under the Third Circuit’s “core operations doctrine”
• finding allegations did not support an inference of scienter because knowledge about a company’s drug pricing—even if a “core operation” of the company—does not mean the speaker knew about illegal activities involving pricing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).