John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & Howell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “under 15 the Sherman Act, rule of reason analysis would be appropriate for the ‘hybrid’ 16 conspiracy”
• concluding that the Supreme Court of California would not follow the decision of an appellate court because its analysis was \flawed\
• writing that a federal appellate court “will follow a state supreme court’s interpretation of its own statute in the absence of extraordinary circumstances”
• explaining that dual distributorships are vertical and 21 analyzed under the rule of reason
• explaining that dual distributorships are vertical and 21 analyzed under the rule of reason
• stating that in a diversity case where “the state’s highest court has not decided an issue, the task of the federal courts is to predict how the state high court would resolve it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).