John M. Collins v. Alco Parking Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that two cited “cases [we]re distinguishable” in part because “neither case applied the plain error standard of review”
• “[M]erely proposing a jury instruction that differs from the charge given is insufficient to preserve an objection.” (quoting Franklin Prescriptions, Inc. v. New York Times Co., 424 F.3d 336, 339 (3d Cir. 2005))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).