· 1/26/1935
John Lucas & Co. v. Evans
Citations
- 141 Kan. 57
- 40 P.2d 359
- 1935 Kan. LEXIS 89
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the definitions of proper cause and change of circumstances as articulated in Vodvarka apply to custody determinations but not to parenting-time determinations
- concluding that “[c]ustody decisions require findings under all of the best-interest factors, but parenting time decisions may be made with findings on only the contested issues”
- stating that a change in parenting time did not affect the established custodial environment because it left the parties with the same number of parenting time days
- explaining that a parenting-time decision only requires findings of fact on contested issues, as opposed to a custody determination, which requires findings on all of the best interest factors
- discussing the need for flexibility in parenting-time schedules because the child’s needs will change with age and with the level of the child’s involvement in activities
- discussing the need for flexibility in parenting time schedules because the child’s needs will change with age and with the level of the child’s involvement in activities
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.