Skip to main content
· 1/26/1935

John Lucas & Co. v. Evans

Citations

  • 141 Kan. 57
  • 40 P.2d 359
  • 1935 Kan. LEXIS 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the definitions of proper cause and change of circumstances as articulated in Vodvarka apply to custody determinations but not to parenting-time determinations
  • concluding that “[c]ustody decisions require findings under all of the best-interest factors, but parenting time decisions may be made with findings on only the contested issues”
  • stating that a change in parenting time did not affect the established custodial environment because it left the parties with the same number of parenting time days
  • explaining that a parenting-time decision only requires findings of fact on contested issues, as opposed to a custody determination, which requires findings on all of the best interest factors
  • discussing the need for flexibility in parenting-time schedules because the child’s needs will change with age and with the level of the child’s involvement in activities
  • discussing the need for flexibility in parenting time schedules because the child’s needs will change with age and with the level of the child’s involvement in activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.