John Lee Ivy v. Stephen F. Pontesso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a § 2241 petition because the petitioner “has not been denied an unobstructed procedural opportunity to present” the claim in a § 2255 motion
• “[Section 2255’s] remedy is 28 ‘inadequate or ineffective’ merely because § 2255's 1 ||gatekeeping provisions prevent the petitioner from filing a 2 ||second or successive petition.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).