John Kohl & Co. PC v. Dearborn & Ewing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that letter from IRS and action in terminating attorney showed that client was on notice of potential injury
• ruling that the plaintiffs suffered an actual injury when their accountant was forced to respond to an IRS inquiry
• holding that a cause of action accrues when the plaintiff knows or should know that the plaintiff has sustained an injury \as a result of wrongful ... conduct by the defendant\
• holding that an injury occurs when one loses a “legal right, remedy or interest”
• holding that the cause of action accrues when the plaintiff knows or should know that it sustained an injury “as a result of wrongful . . . conduct by the defendant”
• noting that in the context of malpractice actions “the discovery rule is composed of two distinct elements: (1) the plaintiff must suffer legally cognizable damage—an actual injury—as a result of the defendant’s wrongful or negligent conduct, and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).