John J. Lennon v. Robert Rubin, Secretary of the Treasury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[F]indings involving material facts genuinely in dispute are reserved to the finder of fact, whether judge or jury, at the trial stage of the proceedings.”
• “There is no significant difference in analysis of the rights and 10 | obligations created by the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act.”
• ALJ’s finding that subjective complaint is “inconsistent 7 with clinical observations” can constitute clear and convincing reason for rejecting 8 testimony if supported by specific findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).