John J. Kinney, Jr. v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that phrase “subject to reduction” encompasses plaintiffs’ claims that employer’s policy may theoretically result in reduction of salary based on quality or quantity of work
• “Good faith requires only a showing that the employer subjectively acted with an ‘honest intention to ascertain what the . . . [FLSA] requires and to act in accordance with it.’” (citation omitted)
• noting interaction be tween the DOL regulations and congressional intent
• “split in judicial decisions” not reasonable basis for defendant’s policy
• interpreting scope of Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).