John Humphries v. OneBeacon America Ins Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that removal under § 1442 does not require consent of co-defendants and holding that a defendant served after removal may assert its right to a federal forum
• “It is the general rule, of course, that a federal appellate court does not consider an issue not passed upon below.” (citation modified)
• “It is the general rule . . . that a federal appellate court does not consider an issue not passed upon below.” (quoting Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 120 (1976))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).