John H.M. Chen v. General Accounting Office

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding an agency’s decision arbitrary and capricious under 31 U.S.C. § 755, even when “otherwise supported by substantial evidence,” because the agency applied the wrong standard of review
• “GAO is generally recognized as a part of the legislative branch.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).