Skip to main content
· 5/25/2017

John Hill & Faye H. Hill v. Lakes of Fondren Southwest

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where a contract “is susceptible to differing interpretations, each of which may be said to be as reasonable as another, then the interpretation of the contract becomes a question of fact for the jury. . . .” (quotations and citation omitted)
  • “[a] written agreement that is complete, clear and unambiguous on its face must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms.”
  • “The existence of an ambiguity, if any, is to be ascertained from the face of an agreement without regard to extrinsic evidence.” (cleaned up)
  • “[B]ecause copyright licenses prohibit any use not authorized, a licen- see infringes the owner’s copyright if its use exceeds the scope of its license.”
  • “Accrual of the statute of limitations begins when a reasonably diligent person in plaintiff’s position would have been put on inquiry as to the claim.”
  • “The essence of an unfair competition claim under New York law is that the defendant has misappropriated the labors and expenditures of another with some element of bad faith.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.