Ninth Circuit· 11/7/1966
John Henry Maxwell v. United States
Citations
- 368 F.2d 735
- 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4471
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that trial court could have found factual basis for plea even though defendant could not personally vouch for his guilt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hamley, Hamlin, Koelsch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1967-03-14· cited 241×
- Ozzie Batchelor v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, James Redden, Solicitor General, Walter L. BarrNinth Circuit· 1982-11-29· cited 145×
- United States v. Elmer Brady, Jr., United States of America v. Joseph James WatersNinth Circuit· 1978-08-08· cited 134×
- Don Wade v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1970-03-30· cited 126×
- United States v. LeachEighth Circuit· 1970-07-23· cited 97×
- United States v. Aubrey Kenneth PorterNinth Circuit· 1970-12-14· cited 61×
- United States v. Theodore WebbFirst Circuit· 1970-10-30· cited 55×
- United States v. Peter Gaston KaiserFifth Circuit· 1977-01-14· cited 54×
- United States v. Mancinas-FloresNinth Circuit· 2009-12-02· cited 52×
- United States v. I. James Bednarski, Jr.First Circuit· 1971-07-22· cited 51×
- United States v. James Lewis SavageNinth Circuit· 1992-11-03· cited 43×
- United States v. Anthony Cartano, A/K/A Etc.First Circuit· 1970-04-20· cited 41×
- United States v. Ernest Leonard Frazier, A/K/A \Dutch\ FrazierEighth Circuit· 1972-04-17· cited 40×
- United States v. J. A. Ray Neel, AKA Ray Henry Barnes, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 1977-02-01· cited 34×
- Lanier Allison Ramer v. United States of America, Eugene Richard Church v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1968-03-25· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. WatsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-11-13· cited 26×
- Pittman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-04-11· cited 22×
- United States v. Lee R. SmithD.C. Circuit· 1974-01-10· cited 21×
- Faunteroy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-04-03· cited 20×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Durham v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1954-09-10· cited 486×
- Lynch v. OverholserSupreme Court· 1962-05-21· cited 478×
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 313×
- Ernest McDonald v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1962-10-08· cited 223×
- United States v. Charles FreemanSecond Circuit· 1966-02-28· cited 220×
- United States v. Donald Kenneth CurrensThird Circuit· 1961-05-01· cited 193×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1897-02-15· cited 171×
- David W. Wion v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1963-12-12· cited 110×
- The United States of America v. Emanuel LesterSecond Circuit· 1957-08-12· cited 97×
- Richard Erwin Sauer v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1957-02-06· cited 81×
- People v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1958-09-19· cited 64×
- State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court· 1958-08-07· cited 57×
- Tomlinson v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1937-11-22· cited 53×
- Hotema v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1902-06-02· cited 42×
- Winfred Overholser, Superintendent, St. Elizabeths Hospital v. Frederick C. LynchD.C. Circuit· 1961-01-26· cited 41×
- Albert Lloyd Andersen v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1956-09-21· cited 40×
- Barbara Luella Rivers v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1959-09-09· cited 38×
- George M. Mason v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1957-12-18· cited 21×
- United States v. Helen MackSeventh Circuit· 1957-11-25· cited 9×
- William Olden McCall v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1958-06-12· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.