John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. v. Chevillon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that 1988 amendments retain for government some discretion in awarding CSCs
• defining the “precise question” before the court as “the extent to which indirect costs are to be funded by [the] defendants”
• \The legislative history indicates one of the primary concerns of Congress in enacting the [1988] amendments [to the ISDA] was the chronic underfunding of tribal indirect costs.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).