Skip to main content
· 11/13/2012

John Haegert v. University of Evansville

Citations

  • 977 N.E.2d 924
  • 34 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1145
  • 2012 WL 5492302
  • 2012 Ind. LEXIS 927
  • 116 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]hen the terms of a contract are drafted in clear and unambiguous language, we will apply the plain and ordinary meaning of that language and enforce the contract according to those terms.”
  • quot- ing Fresh Cut Inc. v. Fazli, 650 N.E.2d 1126, 1129 (Ind. 1995)
  • “plaintiff must prove . . . damages resulting from the breach”
  • “the plaintiff must prove … damages resulting from the breach”
  • “the plaintiff must prove … damages resulting from the breach”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David, Dickson, Rucker, Massa, Rush

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.