· 11/13/2012
John Haegert v. University of Evansville
Citations
- 977 N.E.2d 924
- 34 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1145
- 2012 WL 5492302
- 2012 Ind. LEXIS 927
- 116 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 996
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]hen the terms of a contract are drafted in clear and unambiguous language, we will apply the plain and ordinary meaning of that language and enforce the contract according to those terms.”
- quot- ing Fresh Cut Inc. v. Fazli, 650 N.E.2d 1126, 1129 (Ind. 1995)
- “plaintiff must prove . . . damages resulting from the breach”
- “the plaintiff must prove … damages resulting from the breach”
- “the plaintiff must prove … damages resulting from the breach”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: David, Dickson, Rucker, Massa, Rush
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.