John Gillard, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Betty Mitchell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “jury was privy” to evidence introduced during the guilt phase of trial and counsel need not reintroduce it during the sentencing hearing
• noting that the \jury was privy\ to evidence introduced during the guilt phase of trial and counsel need not reintroduce it during the sentencing hearing
• noting that the “jury was privy” to evidence introduced during the guilt phase of trial and counsel need not reintroduce it during the sentencing hearing
• stating that the sentencer was “privy” to evidence introduced during the guilt phase of trial and that counsel need not reintroduce it during the sentencing hearing
• rejecting habeas claim when trial court “fully inquired into the possible conflict of interest . . . , and the Ohio Supreme Court recognized only the possibility of a conflict of interest”
• noting that a limiting instruction may cure prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).