John George Paschal v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding prospective juror’s comment that his bank had received some the defendant’s counterfeit money inevitably influenced the minds of the other jurors because the comment was directed at the defendant’s guilt and based on special information or knowledge
• prospective juror commented that he was a stockbroker and bank director whose bank had received defendant’s counterfeit money

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Doerr
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1998-11-12· cited 114×
• United States v. Robert G. Blair
  Third Circuit· 1972-02-23· cited 42×
• United States v. Frank Ragano
  Fifth Circuit· 1973-04-09· cited 16×
• Andrew James Leonard v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1963-12-30· cited 4×
• State of Iowa v. Kenneth Osborne Ary
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2015-08-19

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Irvin v. Dowd
  Supreme Court· 1961-06-05· cited 3,697×
• Marshall v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 727×
• Manufacturers' Accident Indemnity Co. v. Dorgan
  Sixth Circuit· 1893-11-06· cited 134×
• Culwell v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1952-03-06· cited 29×
• United States v. Campanaro
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1945-12-31· cited 6×