John George Paschal v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding prospective juror’s comment that his bank had received some the defendant’s counterfeit money inevitably influenced the minds of the other jurors because the comment was directed at the defendant’s guilt and based on special information or knowledge
• prospective juror commented that he was a stockbroker and bank director whose bank had received defendant’s counterfeit money

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).