John Garamendi v. Jean-Francois Hennin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• setting forth standard of review and grounds for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a)
• explaining the difference between a Rule 59(e) and a Rule 60(a) motion
• explaining the difference between a Rule 59(e) and a Rule 60(a) motion
• “[I]t would be ‘incongruous and unfair’ to allow a plaintiff to prevail against defaulting defendants on a legal theory rejected by a court with regard to an answering defendant ‘in the same action.’” (quoting Neilson v. Chang, 253 F.3d 520, 532-33 (9th Cir. 2001)
• discussing the difference between Rule 60(a) and Rule 59(e)
• “We have consistently interpreted Rule 60(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).