John G. Marshall v. Jose E. Perez-Arzuaga, Appeal of Avis Rent-A-Car of Puerto Rico, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that equity supports “accruing post-judgment interest from entry of a judgment on a verdict rather than from the date a motion for a judgment N.O.V. is denied”
• noting that, when motions for judgment N.O.V. are unsuccessful, “equity strongly favors awarding the plaintiff post-judgment interest during the pendency of the motions because the defendant, a judgment debtor, had possession and control of the funds during that period”
• applying the parallel Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and observing, “We agree . . . that there is a difference between cases in which, because of a lack of a Rule 54(b
• “Our inquiry in this case concerns whether entry of judgment in [28 U.S.C. § 1961(a
• four-month period between court’s judgment and denial of motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or new trial
• construing the comparable federal statute and federal rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).