John Furtado v. Harold Bishop, John Furtado v. Harold Bishop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 1983 is not rendered “deficient,” for purposes of § 1988, by the omission of prejudgment interest
• remarking that convictions for assault and battery, among other crimes, were “not particularly probative of credibility”
• prominent attorney's affidavit possessed requisite trustworthiness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).