John Francis Kennedy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• RCW 9.94A.535(2)(c) does not require courts to look beyond facts reflected in jury verdict or admitted by defendant
• “[F]or purposes of computing the offender score in relation to the imposition of an exceptional consecutive sentence, the legislature has determined that current offenses are to be treated as ‘prior convictions.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).