JOHN E. ROBERTS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a jury can “reasonably infer [a defendant’s] consciousness of guilt” based on a “decision to flee law enforcement”
• finding that this factor weighed against a continuance where the defendant did not show “a sudden exigency or unforeseen circumstances”
• explaining an intent to distribute may be inferred from circumstantial evidence like a large quantity of a controlled substance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).