John E. Jones v. City of Memphis, Tennessee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “the theory of respondeat superior would be fundamentally inconsistent with the import of Bivens”
• “the theory of [r]espondeat superior [is] fundamentally inconsistent with the import of Bivens” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “the theory of respondeat superior [is] fundamentally inconsistent with the import of Bivens.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).