Skip to main content
· 6/26/2000

John Doe v. Urohealth Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 216 F.3d 157
  • 46 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1123
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14601

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a parent-subsidiary relationship is a factor supporting a privity claim
  • listing factors the court can consider, including the defendant’s effort and expense of preparation for trial
  • providing that, in deciding a Rule 41(a)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Stahl, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.