John Doe v. Prosecutor, Marion C

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the United States Supreme Court “has invalidated bans on expressive activity that are not the substantive evil if the state had alternative means of combating the evil”
• noting that the United States Supreme Court “has invalidated bans on expressive activity that are not the substantive evil if the state had alternative means of combating the evil”
• acknowledging that \illicit communication comprises a miniscule subset of the universe of social network activity\ and striking down an Indiana statute effectively banning registered sex offenders from all social media use
• invalidating state statute that prevented sex offenders from, among other things, accessing social media sites
• invalidating state statute that prevented sex offenders from, among other things, accessing social media sites
• questioning whether, once sex offenders “are willing to break the existing anti-solicitation law,” a law prohibiting the use of social networking would “provide any more deterrence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).