Skip to main content
· 6/23/2004

John Doe, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States

Citations

  • 372 F.3d 1347
  • 9 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1249
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 12444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, where Congress had not spoken directly on issue and agency was responsible for “filling a gap in the statute,” agency interpretation “based on ... permissible construction of ... statute” was entitled to deference
  • “Because the overtime here was not officially ordered or approved in writing as required by the [OPM] regulation, we hold that the plaintiffs were not entitled to compensation under FEPA____”
  • discussing origins of FEPA and relevant premium pay provisions
  • discussing insufficiency of the alleged written orders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rader, Bryson, Dyk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.