John Doe, Father of John Doe and Mother of John Doe v. Robert I. Kerwood, D.O.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the equitable power of the court to consider exceptions to the 30-day limit on removal
• holding there was no exceptional circumstance when plaintiffs took no action preventing the defendant from obtaining consent from all served defendants
• recognizing the equitable power of the court to consider exceptions to the 30-day limit on removal
• stating that “the FDIC, the FSLIC, and federal officers each have their own specific removal statute,” and “[t]he fact that these parties may remove without the consent of co-defendants is based on the language of those statutes”
• remanding because all defendants did not join in notice of removal based on federal question jurisdiction
• addressing such criticism and noting it is within the court's equitable power to remedy the situation should a defendant show that a plaintiff manipulated the timing of service in a multiple defendant case to preclude a timely removal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).