John Doe, a Minor, by and Through His Parent and Next Friend, Mary Doe v. I

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that student's most recent grades were known by both his parents and school offi- cials
• noting that it would “exalt form over substance” to ignore information known to parents and administrators simply because it was not contained in the four corners of the IEP
• explaining that procedural claims concern “the process by which the IEP is produced, rather than the myriad of technical items that must be included in the written document”
• noting that it would “exalt form over substance” to ig- nore information known to parents and administrators simply because it was not contained in the four corners of the IEP
• declining to \exalt form over substance\ by holding that technical deviations from the Act's procedural requirements render an IEP invalid
• declining to “exalt form over substance” by holding that technical deviations from the Act’s procedural requirements render an IEP invalid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).