John Dobosz v. Joseph A. Walsh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s five-month suspension did not constitute a sufficient plus factor because plaintiff was later reinstated with back pay and seniority credit
• denying qualified immunity defense on summary judgment \[b]ecause the proscription of retaliation for a plaintiff's exercise of First Amendment rights has long been established\
• “[T]he proscription of retaliation for a plaintiff's exercise of First Amendment rights has long been established”
• “[T]he proscription of retaliation for a plaintiff’s exercise of First Amendment rights has long been established.”
• “[T]he proscription of retaliation for a plaintiff’s exercise of First Amendment rights has long been established”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).