Skip to main content
· 11/10/2004

John Depenbrock v. Cigna Corp. Cigna Pension Plan

Citations

  • 389 F.3d 78
  • 33 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2665
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 23487
  • 2004 WL 2534343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding impermissible the ratification of cash balance plan conversion amendment because participant had right to receive benefits under pre- amendment plan
  • \[A]n amendment is ineffective if it is inconsistent with the governing instruments. . . . ERISA specifies that a valid amendment can only be made in the manner specified in the plan document.\
  • “[A]n amendment is ineffective if it is inconsistent with the governing instruments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKEE, Rosenn, Weis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.