· 11/10/2004
John Depenbrock v. Cigna Corp. Cigna Pension Plan
Citations
- 389 F.3d 78
- 33 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2665
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 23487
- 2004 WL 2534343
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding impermissible the ratification of cash balance plan conversion amendment because participant had right to receive benefits under pre- amendment plan
- \[A]n amendment is ineffective if it is inconsistent with the governing instruments. . . . ERISA specifies that a valid amendment can only be made in the manner specified in the plan document.\
- “[A]n amendment is ineffective if it is inconsistent with the governing instruments.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKEE, Rosenn, Weis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.