John Deere Limited and Deere & Company v. Sperry Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under Section 1782, there is “little question as to the propriety of honoring [a] request for assistance” from the Federal Court of Canada
• “requir[ing] that a district court undertake a more extensive inquiry into the laws of the foreign jurisdiction would seem to exceed the proper scope of section 1782.”
• \[A] district court is not to predict the admissibility of discovered evidence in foreign tribunals.\
• \The liberal intent to provide judicial assistance whether or not reciprocity exists has been acknowledged as a primary statutory goal since section 1782's inception.\
• “[A] district court is not to predict the admissibility of discovered evidence in foreign tribunals.”
• “The liberal intent to provide judicial assistance whether or not reciprocity exists has been acknowledged as a primary statutory goal since section 1782’s inception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).