Skip to main content
· 11/15/2004

John David Smith, of the Estate of Louis R. Smith, Deceased v. United States

Citations

  • 391 F.3d 621
  • 33 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2931
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 23903
  • 2004 WL 2591970

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that non-movant must “articulate the precise manner in which the submitted or identified evidence supports his or her claim”
  • asserting that parties should include specific, not general, citations to summary judgment evidence
  • asserting that parties should include specific, not general, citations to summary judgment evidence
  • explaining that parties should include specific citations to summary judgment evidence
  • “The nonmovant is also required to articulate the precise manner in which the submitted or identified evidence supports his or her claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Higginbotham, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.