· 11/15/2004
John David Smith, of the Estate of Louis R. Smith, Deceased v. United States
Citations
- 391 F.3d 621
- 33 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2931
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 23903
- 2004 WL 2591970
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that non-movant must “articulate the precise manner in which the submitted or identified evidence supports his or her claim”
- asserting that parties should include specific, not general, citations to summary judgment evidence
- asserting that parties should include specific, not general, citations to summary judgment evidence
- explaining that parties should include specific citations to summary judgment evidence
- “The nonmovant is also required to articulate the precise manner in which the submitted or identified evidence supports his or her claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Higginbotham, Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.