John David Carrasco v. Inran Pishori

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[P]roposed [jury] instructions do not preserve error on appeal, absent an objection specific to the counts at issue.”
• \the ultimate decision whether . . . to take notice of an error not raised below must depend on the facts of the particular case\ (quoting United States v. Morales, 117 F.2d 1309, 1315 (5th Cir.1973))
• “[U]nder Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, these proposed instructions do not preserve error on appeal, absent an objection specific to the counts at issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).