Skip to main content

John Crane, Inc. v. Jones

Citations

  • 604 S.E.2d 822
  • 278 Ga. 747
  • 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 3572
  • 2004 Ga. LEXIS 996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in a case involving joint tortfeasors, trial court was not required to charge that each tortfeasor had to be a “substantial” contributing factor in producing the plaintiff s injuries in order to be considered a proximate cause of the injuries
  • declining to diverge from longstanding negligence principles for public-policy reasons because the ordinary proximate-cause standard already addressed the relevant policy concerns
  • declining to diverge from longstanding negligence principles for public-policy reasons because the ordinary proximate-cause standard already addressed the relevant policy concerns
  • “the jury charge at issue would not have misled the jury into believing that it could award damages for a de minimis exposure to asbestos”
  • “the jury charge at issue would not have misled the jury into believing that it could award damages for a de minimis exposure to asbestos”
  • “[T]he jury charge [on ‘contributing factor’] would not have misled the jury into believing that it could award damages for a de minimus exposure to asbestos.” (Citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named John Crane, Inc. v. Jones

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.