John C. Wilson Company, Inc. v. Regions Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an expert’s testimony may not only be based on “particularized training” but can also be “from personal observations or experience”
• affirming that “the district court fashioned a satisfactory remedy by granting [the defendant] a six-day continuance” where the government disclosed during trial its intent to elicit expert testimony
• noting a “district court’s broad discretion in 44 fashioning a remedy for Rule 16 failures, which may include . . . ordering the exclusion of evidence” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• noting Hobbs Act robbery is crime of violence under the elements clause
• noting Hobbs Act robbery is crime of violence under the elements clause
• noting Hobbs Act robbery is crime of violence under the elements clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).