Skip to main content
· 1/22/2002

John C. Leisek v. Brightwood Corporation, an Active Oregon Corporation

Citations

  • 278 F.3d 895
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 779
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 560
  • 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2262
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 854
  • 2002 WL 77034

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • listing “proximity 11 in time between the employee’s military activity and the adverse employment action” as 12 a factor courts may consider in inferring discriminatory intent under USERRA
  • listing “inconsistencies between the proffered reason and other 18 actions of the employer” as one of the grounds courts may consider in determining 19 whether an employer acted with discriminatory intent
  • elements of a discrimination claim under USERRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Tashima, Graber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.