John C. Kelliher v. Ann M. Veneman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a party makes “no arguments on the merits as to [an] issue, the issue is deemed waived”
• holding that mentioning a claim in the summary of the argument section is not enough to raise the issue for appeal and that the claim is deemed abandoned
• holding that mentioning a claim in the summary of the argument section is not enough to raise the issue for appeal and that the claim is deemed abandoned
• holding that mentioning a claim in the summary of the argument section is not enough to raise the issue for appeal and that the claim is deemed abandoned
• explaining that, during that time period, the Eleventh Circuit had jurisdiction only over petitions of “mixed” cases involving whistleblower and discrimination claims
• deciding case brought under both Title VII and the ADEA under the same standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).