· 9/2/2004
John C. Honor, Jr. v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Incorporated
Citations
- 383 F.3d 180
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18593
- 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,766
- 94 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 577
- 2004 WL 1945733
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that elements of prima facie § 1981 and Title VII retaliation claims are identical
- recognizing that hiring or promoting a better qualified candidate is a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for hiring or promoting someone
- holding that retaliation and wrongful termination claims could not proceed because “a reasonable jury could find that [plaintiff] voluntarily resigned his employment”
- recognizing that elements of prima facie Section 1981 and Title VII retaliation claims are identical
- recognizing that the elements of a prima facie Section 1983 and Title VII retaliation claims are identical
- holding that retaliation and wrongful termination claims could not proceed because “a reasonable jury only could find that [plaintiff] voluntarily resigned his employment . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Widener, Williams, Beezer, Ninth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.