John Burich v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that regularly given assignments that often-caused plaintiff to work overtime were not regularly scheduled because the time for completion could not be ascertained
• finding a failure by the Government to make overtime payments after overtime work was performed accrued at that point in time
• discussing the doctrine as employed in pay cases
• “This court has long adhered to the view that a suit for compensation due and payable periodically is, by its very nature, a ‘continuing claim’ which involves multiple causes of action, each arising at the time the Government fails to make the payment alleged to be due.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).