John BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that conflicting evidence may indicate that the claimant’s limitations were not sufficiently documented or worsened over time
• Reversing and remanding the ALJ’s decision because the new evidence submitted to the “Social Security Appeals Council . . . undermines the ALJ’s analysis.”
• remanding where ALJ decided that plaintiff’s “seizures were caused by a failure to take his medication” when no treatment provider said so
• considering evidence of symptoms that occurred six months after the ALJ’s decision, but that related to a previously complained of condition
• reversing an ALJ's decision after finding the determination that plaintiff's condition was not medically equivalent to a listed impairment \[wa]s no longer a reasonable interpretation of the medical evidence in the record\
• ALJ decided on his own that plaintiff’s “seizures were caused by a failure to take his medication” when no treatment provider said so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).