John Auriemma v. James Montgomery and Donald Hubert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \administrative tasks . . . are not intimately associated with the judicial process\
• affording absolute immunity to government attorneys for their “discovery under the rules of civil procedure” but not for their “pretrial investigations that occur outside the rules of discovery”
• no absolute immunity for extra-judicial, pretrial investigations by government attorneys; absolute immunity available “only when such activities are intimately associated with the court-related duties”
• “Absolute immunity is designed to protect the functions that particular government officials perform, not the government officials themselves.”
• “Absolute immunity is designed to protect the functions that particular government officials perform, not the government officials themselves.”
• “Absolute immunity is designed to protect the functions that particular government officials perform, not the government officials themselves.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).