John Arnzen, III v. Charles Palmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that video surveillance of individuals in single- occupancy bathrooms in a civil commitment unit violated a reasonable expectation of privacy under the Fourth Amendment
• affirming district court’s issuance of a preliminary injunction prohibiting staff from capturing images of civilly committed sex offenders while they occupied single-person bathrooms
• internal quotation 5 Plaintiff advised the court on December 14, 2020, that he was transferred back to the NRC on December 7, 2020. (Filing 10.) 20 marks and citation omitted
• factors a court must consider when determining whether preliminary relief is warranted
• to obtain preliminary injunctive relief, the movant must explain: (1) the threat of irreparable harm to the movant; (2) the balance between the harm to the movant and the harm to the nonmoving party should the injunction be issued; (3
• to obtain preliminary injunctive relief, the movant must explain: (1) the threat of irreparable harm to the movant; (2) the balance between the harm to the movant and the harm to the nonmoving party should the injunction be issued; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).