· 9/4/2001
John A. Ramunno, Jr. v. United States
Citations
- 264 F.3d 723
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19601
- 2001 WL 1006197
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Vacating a certificate of appealability is an unusual step, . . . but the possibility of review is essential if the statutory limits are to be implemented”
- “Vacating a certificate of appealability is an unusual step, . . . but the possibility of review is essential if the statutory limits are to be implemented”
- government must bring alleged defect in CA to this court’s attention “early in the process”
- government must bring alleged defect in the CA to this court’s attention “early in the process”
- “Disputes about a petition’s timeliness do not support an appeal unless a substantial constitutional issue lurks in the background, and the statutory question is independently substantial.”
- question of a petition’s timeliness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Manion, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.