John A. Logan v. Harold Clarke John I. Cherry, Jr., Dr. And Dr. Schroenrock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that prison doctors were not deliberately indifferent, even though they did not act as quickly as hindsight perhaps suggested that they should have
• concluding that the defendants’ efforts “while perhaps not as extensive as those a private health- care provider might have taken, did not reflect deliberate indifference to [the plaintiff’s] medical needs”
• concluding doctors’ efforts, which the prisoner was unable or refused to follow, were not deliberately indifferent
• concluding that “substantial back pain” is a serious medical need
• holding that “substantial back pain” is a serious medical need
• finding no deliberate indifference when the doctors’ efforts to treat a prisoner “were impeded by [the prisoner’s] apparent inability or refusal to follow their instructions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).